Researcher profile

A. Sornette

A. Sornette contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - Baseline
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2000arXiv

Acoustic fluidization for earthquakes?

Melosh [1996] has suggested that acoustic fluidization could provide an alternative to theories that are invoked as explanations for why some crustal faults appear to be weak. We show that there is a subtle but profound inconsistency in the theory that unfortunately invalidates the results. We propose possible remedies but must acknowledge that the relevance of acoustic fluidization remains an open question.

preprint1999arXiv

Renormalization of earthquake aftershocks

Together with the Gutenberg-Richter distribution of earthquake magnitudes, Omori&#39;s law is the best established empirical characterization of earthquake sequences and states that the number of smaller earthquakes per unit time triggered by a main shock decays approximately as the inverse of the time ($1/t^p$, with $p \approx 1$) since the main shock. Based on these observations, we explore the theoretical hypothesis in which each earthquake can produce a series of aftershock independently of its size according to its ``local&#39;&#39; Omori&#39;s law with exponent $p=1+θ$. In this scenario, an aftershock of the main shock produces itself other aftershocks which themselves produce aftershocks, and so on. The global observable Omori&#39;s law is found to have two distinct power law regimes, the first one with exponent $p_-=1 - θ$ for time $t < t^* \sim κ^{-1/θ}$, where $0<1-κ<1$ measures the fraction of triggered earthquakes per triggering earthquake, and the second one with exponent $p_+=1 + θ$ for larger times. The existence of these two regimes rationalizes the observation of Kisslinger and Jones [1991] that the Omori&#39;s exponent $p$ seems positively correlated to the surface heat flow: a higher heat flow is a signature of a higher crustal temperature, which leads to larger strain relaxation by creep, corresponding to fewer events triggered per earthquake, i.e. to a larger $κ$, and thus to a smaller $t^*$, leading to an effective measured exponent more heavily weighted toward $p_+>1$.

preprint1998arXiv

An Observational Test of the Critical Earthquake Concept

We test the concept that seismicity prior to a large earthquake can be understood in terms of the statistical physics of a critical phase transition. In this model, the cumulative seismic strain release increases as a power-law time-to-failure before the final event. Furthermore, the region of correlated seismicity predicted by this model is much greater than would be predicted from simple elasto-dynamic interactions. We present a systematic procedure to test for the accelerating seismicity predicted by the critical point model and to identify the region approaching criticality, based on a comparison between the observed cumulative energy (Benioff strain) release and the power-law behavior predicted by theory. This method is used to find the critical region before all earthquakes along the San Andreas system since 1950 with M 6.5. The statistical significance of our results is assessed by performing the same procedure on a large number of randomly generated synthetic catalogs. The null hypothesis, that the observed acceleration in all these earthquakes could result from spurious patterns generated by our procedure in purely random catalogs, is rejected with 99.5% confidence. An empirical relation between the logarithm of the critical region radius (R) and the magnitude of the final event (M) is found, such that log R μ0.5 M, suggesting that the largest probable event in a given region scales with the size of the regional fault network.

preprint1998arXiv

Solid friction at high sliding velocities: an explicit 3D dynamical SPH approach

We present realistic 3D numerical simulations of elastic bodies sliding on top of each other in a regime of velocities ranging from meters to tens of meters per second using the so-called Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method. Our investigations are restricted to regimes of pressure and roughness where only elastic deformations occur between asperities at the contact surface between the slider block and the substrate. In this regime, solid friction is due to the generation of vibrational radiations which are subsequently damped out. We study periodic commensurate and incommensurate asperities and various types of disordered surfaces. We report the evidence of a transition from zero (or non-measurable $μ< 0.001$) friction to a finite friction as the normal pressure increases above about $10^6~Pa$. For larger normal pressures (up to $10^9~Pa$), we find a remarkably universal value for the friction coefficient $μ\approx 0.06$, which is independent of the internal dissipation strength over three order of magnitudes, and independent of the detailled nature of the slider block-substrate interactions. We find that disorder may either decrease or increase $μ$ due to the competition between two effects: disorder detunes the coherent vibrations of the asperties that occur in the periodic case, leading to weaker acoustic radiation and thus weaker damping. On the other hand, large disorder leads to stronger vibration amplitudes at local asperities and thus stronger damping. Our simulations have confirmed the existence of jumps over steps or asperities of the slider blocks occurring at the largest velocities studied ($10~m/s$). These jumps lead to chaotic motions similar to the bouncing-ball problem. We find a velocity strengthening with a doubling of the friction coefficient as the velocity increases from $1~m/s$ to $10~m/s$.