Paper detail

Removing Data Heterogeneity Influence Enhances Network Topology Dependence of Decentralized SGD

We consider the decentralized stochastic optimization problems, where a network of $n$ nodes, each owning a local cost function, cooperate to find a minimizer of the globally-averaged cost. A widely studied decentralized algorithm for this problem is decentralized SGD (D-SGD), in which each node averages only with its neighbors. D-SGD is efficient in single-iteration communication, but it is very sensitive to the network topology. For smooth objective functions, the transient stage (which measures the number of iterations the algorithm has to experience before achieving the linear speedup stage) of D-SGD is on the order of $Ω(n/(1-β)^2)$ and $Ω(n^3/(1-β)^4)$ for strongly and generally convex cost functions, respectively, where $1-β\in (0,1)$ is a topology-dependent quantity that approaches $0$ for a large and sparse network. Hence, D-SGD suffers from slow convergence for large and sparse networks. In this work, we study the non-asymptotic convergence property of the D$^2$/Exact-diffusion algorithm. By eliminating the influence of data heterogeneity between nodes, D$^2$/Exact-diffusion is shown to have an enhanced transient stage that is on the order of $\tildeΩ(n/(1-β))$ and $Ω(n^3/(1-β)^2)$ for strongly and generally convex cost functions, respectively. Moreover, when D$^2$/Exact-diffusion is implemented with gradient accumulation and multi-round gossip communications, its transient stage can be further improved to $\tildeΩ(1/(1-β)^{\frac{1}{2}})$ and $\tildeΩ(n/(1-β))$ for strongly and generally convex cost functions, respectively. These established results for D$^2$/Exact-Diffusion have the best (i.e., weakest) dependence on network topology to our knowledge compared to existing decentralized algorithms. We also conduct numerical simulations to validate our theories.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.