Paper detail

Regularizing Double Machine Learning in Partially Linear Endogenous Models

The linear coefficient in a partially linear model with confounding variables can be estimated using double machine learning (DML). However, this DML estimator has a two-stage least squares (TSLS) interpretation and may produce overly wide confidence intervals. To address this issue, we propose a regularization and selection scheme, regsDML, which leads to narrower confidence intervals. It selects either the TSLS DML estimator or a regularization-only estimator depending on whose estimated variance is smaller. The regularization-only estimator is tailored to have a low mean squared error. The regsDML estimator is fully data driven. The regsDML estimator converges at the parametric rate, is asymptotically Gaussian distributed, and asymptotically equivalent to the TSLS DML estimator, but regsDML exhibits substantially better finite sample properties. The regsDML estimator uses the idea of k-class estimators, and we show how DML and k-class estimation can be combined to estimate the linear coefficient in a partially linear endogenous model. Empirical examples demonstrate our methodological and theoretical developments. Software code for our regsDML method is available in the R-package dmlalg.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.