Paper detail

Regret bounds for Narendra-Shapiro bandit algorithms

Narendra-Shapiro (NS) algorithms are bandit-type algorithms that have been introduced in the sixties (with a view to applications in Psychology or learning automata), whose convergence has been intensively studied in the stochastic algorithm literature. In this paper, we adress the following question: are the Narendra-Shapiro (NS) bandit algorithms competitive from a \textit{regret} point of view? In our main result, we show that some competitive bounds can be obtained for such algorithms in their penalized version (introduced in \cite{Lamberton_Pages}). More precisely, up to an over-penalization modification, the pseudo-regret $\bar{R}_n$ related to the penalized two-armed bandit algorithm is uniformly bounded by $C \sqrt{n}$ (where $C$ is made explicit in the paper). \noindent We also generalize existing convergence and rates of convergence results to the multi-armed case of the over-penalized bandit algorithm, including the convergence toward the invariant measure of a Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process (PDMP) after a suitable renormalization. Finally, ergodic properties of this PDMP are given in the multi-armed case.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.