Paper detail

Reconciling Power Law Slopes in Solar Flare and Nanoflare Size Distributions

We unify the power laws of size distributions of solar flare and nanoflare energies. We present three models that predict the power law slopes $α_E$ of flare energies defined in terms of the 2-D and 3-D fractal dimensions ($D_A, D_V$): (i) The spatio-temporal standard SOC model, defined by the power law slope $α_{E1}=1+2/(D_V+2)=(13/9)\approx 1.44$; (ii) the 2-D thermal energy model, $α_{E2}=1+2/D_A=(7/3)\approx 2.33$, and (iii) the 3-D thermal energy model, $α_{E3}=1+2/D_V=(9/5)\approx 1.80$. The theoretical predictions of energies are consistent with the observational values of these three groups, i.e., $α_{E1}=1.47 \pm 0.07$; $α_{E2}=2.38 \pm 0.09$, and $α_{E3}=1.80 \pm 0.18$. These results corroborate that the energy of nanoflares does not diverge at small energies, since $(α_{E1}<2$) and $(α_{E3}<2)$, except for the unphyiscal 2-D model $(α_{E2}>2)$. This conclusion adds an additional argument against the scenario of coronal heating by nanoflares.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.