Paper detail

Realization of ppm level pressure stability for primary thermometry using a primary piston gauge

To achieve an uncertainty of 0.25 mK in single-pressure refractive-index gas thermometry (SPRIGT), the relative pressure variation of He-4 gas in the range 30 kPa to 90 kPa, should not exceed 4 ppm (k=1). To this end, a novel pressure control system has been developed. It consists of two main parts: a piston gauge to control the pressure, and a home-made gas compensation system to supplement the micro-leak of the piston gauge. In addition, to maintain the piston at constant height, a servo loop is used that automatically determines in real time the amount of extra gas required. At room temperature, the standard deviations of the stabilized pressure are 3.0 mPa at 30 kPa, 4.5 mPa at 60 kPa and 2 mPa at 90 kPa. For the temperature region 5 K-25 K used for SPRIGT in the present work, the relative pressure stability is better than 0.16 ppm i.e. 25 times better than required. Moreover, the same pressure stabilization system is readily transposable to other primary gas thermometers.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.