Paper detail

Rank-Regret Minimization

Multi-criteria decision-making often requires finding a small representative set from the database. A recently proposed method is the regret minimization set (RMS) query. RMS returns a size $r$ subset $S$ of dataset $D$ that minimizes the regret-ratio (the difference between the score of top-1 in $S$ and the score of top-1 in $D$, for any possible utility function). RMS is not shift invariant, causing inconsistency in results. Further, existing work showed that the regret-ratio is often a made-up number and users may mistake its absolute value. Instead, users do understand the notion of rank. Thus it considered the problem of finding the minimal set $S$ with a rank-regret (the rank of top-1 tuple of $S$ in the sorted list of $D$) at most $k$, called the rank-regret representative (RRR) problem. Corresponding to RMS, we focus on the min-error version of RRR, called the rank-regret minimization (RRM) problem, which finds a size $r$ set to minimize the maximum rank-regret for all utility functions. Further, we generalize RRM and propose the restricted RRM (i.e., RRRM) problem to optimize the rank-regret for functions restricted in a given space. Previous studies on both RMS and RRR did not consider the restricted function space. The solution for RRRM usually has a lower regret level and can better serve the specific preferences of some users. Note that RRM and RRRM are shift invariant. In 2D space, we design a dynamic programming algorithm 2DRRM to return the optimal solution for RRM. In HD space, we propose an algorithm HDRRM that introduces a double approximation guarantee on rank-regret. Both 2DRRM and HDRRM are applicable for RRRM. Extensive experiments on the synthetic and real datasets verify the efficiency and effectiveness of our algorithms. In particular, HDRRM always has the best output quality in experiments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.