Source author record

Xingxing Xiao

Xingxing Xiao appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Rank-Regret Minimization

Multi-criteria decision-making often requires finding a small representative set from the database. A recently proposed method is the regret minimization set (RMS) query. RMS returns a size $r$ subset $S$ of dataset $D$ that minimizes the regret-ratio (the difference between the score of top-1 in $S$ and the score of top-1 in $D$, for any possible utility function). RMS is not shift invariant, causing inconsistency in results. Further, existing work showed that the regret-ratio is often a made-up number and users may mistake its absolute value. Instead, users do understand the notion of rank. Thus it considered the problem of finding the minimal set $S$ with a rank-regret (the rank of top-1 tuple of $S$ in the sorted list of $D$) at most $k$, called the rank-regret representative (RRR) problem. Corresponding to RMS, we focus on the min-error version of RRR, called the rank-regret minimization (RRM) problem, which finds a size $r$ set to minimize the maximum rank-regret for all utility functions. Further, we generalize RRM and propose the restricted RRM (i.e., RRRM) problem to optimize the rank-regret for functions restricted in a given space. Previous studies on both RMS and RRR did not consider the restricted function space. The solution for RRRM usually has a lower regret level and can better serve the specific preferences of some users. Note that RRM and RRRM are shift invariant. In 2D space, we design a dynamic programming algorithm 2DRRM to return the optimal solution for RRM. In HD space, we propose an algorithm HDRRM that introduces a double approximation guarantee on rank-regret. Both 2DRRM and HDRRM are applicable for RRRM. Extensive experiments on the synthetic and real datasets verify the efficiency and effectiveness of our algorithms. In particular, HDRRM always has the best output quality in experiments.