Paper detail

Random strain fluctuations as dominant disorder source for high-quality on-substrate graphene devices

We have performed systematic investigations of transport through graphene on hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) substrates, together with confocal Raman measurements and a targeted theoretical analysis, to identify the dominant source of disorder in this system. Low-temperature transport measurements on many devices reveal a clear correlation between the carrier mobility $μ$ and the width $n^*$ of the resistance peak around charge neutrality, demonstrating that charge scattering and density inhomogeneities originate from the same microscopic mechanism. The study of weak-localization unambiguously shows that this mechanism is associated to a long-ranged disorder potential, and provides clear indications that random pseudo-magnetic fields due to strain are the dominant scattering source. Spatially resolved Raman spectroscopy measurements confirm the role of local strain fluctuations, since the line-width of the Raman 2D-peak --containing information of local strain fluctuations present in graphene-- correlates with the value of maximum observed mobility. The importance of strain is corroborated by a theoretical analysis of the relation between $μ$ and $n^*$ that shows how local strain fluctuations reproduce the experimental data at a quantitative level, with $n^*$ being determined by the scalar deformation potential and $μ$ by the random pseudo-magnetic field (consistently with the conclusion drawn from the analysis of weak-localization). Throughout our study, we compare the behavior of devices on hBN substrates to that of devices on SiO$_2$ and SrTiO$_3$, and find that all conclusions drawn for the case of hBN are compatible with the observations made on these other materials. These observations suggest that random strain fluctuations are the dominant source of disorder for high-quality graphene on many different substrates, and not only on hexagonal boron nitride.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.