Paper detail

Radial-like Toeplitz operators on Cartan domains of type I

Let $\mathrm{D}^\mathrm{I}_{n \times n}$ be the Cartan domain of type I which consists of the complex $n \times n$ matrices $Z$ that satisfy $Z^*Z < I_n$. For a symbol $a \in L^\infty(\mathrm{D}^\mathrm{I}_{n \times n})$ we consider three radial-like type conditions: 1) left (right) $\mathrm{U}(n)$-invariant symbols, which can be defined by the condition $a(Z) = a\big((Z^*Z)^\frac{1}{2}\big)$ ($a(Z) = a\big((ZZ^*)^\frac{1}{2}\big)$, respectively), and 2) $\mathrm{U}(n) \times \mathrm{U}(n)$-invariant symbols, which are defined by the condition $a(A^{-1}ZB) = a(Z)$ for every $A, B \in \mathrm{U}(n)$. We prove that, for $n \geq 2$, these yield different sets of symbols. If $a$ satisfies 1), either left or right, and $b$ satisfies 2), then we prove that the corresponding Toeplitz operators $T_a$ and $T_b$ commute on every weighted Bergman space. Furthermore, among those satisfying condition 1), either left or right, there exist, for $n \geq 2$, symbols $a$ whose corresponding Toeplitz operators $T_a$ are non-normal. We use these facts to prove the existence, for $n \geq 2$, of commutative Banach non-$C^*$ algebras generated by Toeplitz operators.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.