Paper detail

r-G2P: Evaluating and Enhancing Robustness of Grapheme to Phoneme Conversion by Controlled noise introducing and Contextual information incorporation

Grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) conversion is the process of converting the written form of words to their pronunciations. It has an important role for text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis and automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. In this paper, we aim to evaluate and enhance the robustness of G2P models. We show that neural G2P models are extremely sensitive to orthographical variations in graphemes like spelling mistakes. To solve this problem, we propose three controlled noise introducing methods to synthesize noisy training data. Moreover, we incorporate the contextual information with the baseline and propose a robust training strategy to stabilize the training process. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed robust G2P model (r-G2P) outperforms the baseline significantly (-2.73\% WER on Dict-based benchmarks and -9.09\% WER on Real-world sources).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.