Paper detail

R-Estimation for Asymmetric Independent Component Analysis

Independent Component Analysis (ICA) recently has attracted attention in the statistical literature as an alternative to elliptical models. Whereas k-dimensional elliptical densities depend on one single unspecified radial density, however, k-dimensional independent component distributions involve k unspecified component densities that for given sample size n and dimension k making statistical analysis harder. We focus here on estimating the model's mixing matrix. Traditional methods (FOBI, Kernel-ICA, FastICA) originating from the engineering literature have consistency that requires moment conditions without achieving any type of asymptotic efficiency. When based on robust scatter matrices, the two-scatter methods developed by Oja, et al. (2006) and Nordhausen, et al. (2008) enjoy better robustness features but have unclear optimality properties. The semiparametric approach by Chen and Bickel (2006) achieves semiparametric efficiency but requires estimating the k unobserved independent component densities. As a reaction, an efficient (signed-)rank-based approach has been proposed by Ilmonen and Paindaveine (2011) for the case of symmetric component densities that fail to be root-n consistent as soon as one of the component densities is asymmetric. In this paper, using ranks rather than signed ranks, we extend their approach to the asymmetric case and propose a one-step R-estimator for ICA mixing matrices. The finite-sample performances of those estimators are investigated and compared to those of existing methods under moderately large sample sizes. Particularly good performances are obtained when using data-driven scores taking into account the skewness and kurtosis of residuals. Finally, we show, by an empirical exercise, that our methods also may provide excellent results in a context such as image analysis, where the basic assumptions of ICA are quite unlikely to hold.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.