Paper detail

Quasiscaling in the analysis of the yield ratio $π^-/π^+$: Mathematical structure and estimation of source size

Recently we have found that integral of the squared Coulomb wave function describing systemcomposed of charged pion and central charged fragment $Z_{eff}$ protons, $|ψ_r(r)|^2$, times pion source function $ρ(r)$ (of the size $β$), $\intdr |ψ_r(r)|^2 ρ(r)$, shows a quasiscaling behavior. This is approximately invariant under the following transformation: $(β,Z_{eff}) \to (λβ,λZ_{eff})$; $λ>0$. We called such behavior $β-Z_{eff}$ quasiscaling. We examine this quasiscaling behavior in detail. In particular we provide a semi-analytical examination of this behavior and confirm it for the exponential pionic source functions in addition to the Gaussian ones and for the production of K mesons as well. When combined with the results of the HBT, a result of the yield ratio allows us to estimate the size of the central charged fragment (CCF) to be $125\le Z_{eff}\le 150$ for Pb+Pb collisions at energy 158 GeV/nucleon. From our estimation, the baryon number density $0.024 \le n_{B}\le0.036$ [1/fm^3] is obtained.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.