Paper detail

Quark Mass Hierarchy, FCNC and CP violation in a Seesaw model

The seesaw model of quark masses is studied systematically, focusing on its developments. A framework allowing the top quark mass to be of the order of the electroweak symmetry breaking scale, while the remaining light quarks have much smaller masses, due to the seesaw mechanism, is presented. The violation of the GIM mechanism is shown to be small and the tree level FCNC are suppressed naturally. In this model, there are many particles which could contribute to the FCNC in the one-loop level. Parameters of the model are constrained by using the experimental data on K^0-\bar{K}^0 mixing and ε_K. The rare K meson decays K_{L,S} -> π^0 ν\barν and K^+ -> π^+ ν\barν are also investigated in the model. In these processes the scalar operators (\bar{s}d)(\barν_τν_τ), which are derived from box diagrams in the model, play an important role due to an enhancement factor M_K/m_s in the matrix element <π|\bar{s}d|K>. It is emphasized that the K_L decay process through the scalar operator is not the CP violating mode, so B(K_L -> π^0 ν\barν) remains non-zero even in the CP conserved limit. The pion energy spectra for these processes are predicted.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.