Paper detail

Quantum simulator of extended bipartite Hubbard model with broken sublattice symmetry: magnetism, correlations, and phase transitions

We describe here a quantum simulator of extended bipartite Hubbard model with broken sublattice symmetry. The simulator consists of a structured lateral gate confining two dimensional electrons in a quantum well into artificial minima arranged in a hexagonal lattice. The sublattice symmetry breaking is generated by forming an artificial triangular graphene quantum dot (ATGQD) with zigzag edges. The resulting extended Hubbard model generates tunable ratio of tunneling strength to electron-electron interactions and of sublattice symmetry with control over shape. The validity of the simulator is confirmed for small systems using mean-field and exact diagonalization many-body approaches which show that the ground state changes from a metallic to an antiferromagnetic (AF) phase by varying the distance between sites or depth of the confining potential. The one-electron spectrum of these triangular dots contains a macroscopically degenerate shell at the Fermi level. The shell persists at the mean-field level for weak interactions (metallic phase) but disappears for strong interactions, in the AF phase. We determine the effects of electron-electron interactions on the ground state, the total spin, and the excitation spectrum as a function of filling of the ATGQD. We find that the half-filled charge neutral shell leads to a partially spin polarized state in both metallic and AF regimes in accordance with Liebs theorem. In both regimes a relatively large gap separates the spin polarized ground state to the first excited many-body state at half filling of the degenerate shell. By adding or removing an electron, this gap drops dramatically, and alternate total spin states emerge with energies nearly degenerate to a spin polarized ground state.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.