Paper detail

Quantum phase transition from a Antiferromagnetic-Insulator to a Paramagnetic-Metal laying beneath the superconducting dome

The effect of doping on the TB model of the CuO planes in the La2CuO4 constructed in previous works is investigated. Firstly, it is noted that the model employed constitutes a generalization of the Hubbard one for the same system. Thus, the former predictions of the insulator gap, antiferromagnetic character and the existence of a paramagnetic-pseudogap state, become natural ones to be expected from this more general picture. The effect of hole doping on the antiferromagnetic-insulator state (AFI) and the paramagnetic-pseudogap one, is investigated. The results predict a quantum phase transition (QPT) from the AFI state at low doping to a paramagnetic-metallic state (PM) at higher hole densities. Therefore, a clear description of the hidden QPT laying beneath the dome in high critical temperature superconducting materials is found. At low doping, the system prefers the AFI state, and at the critical value of the doping density 0.2, the energy of a metallic state becomes lower. The evolution with small doping values of the band spectrum of the AFI state, shows that the holes tend to become localized at the middle of the sides of the reduced Brillouin zone (BZ). Then, around the critical value, the holes of the AFI state move to become situated at the corners of the same reduced BZ, showing a structural change at the phase transition point. Thus, the PM state appearing at the QPT acquires the same behavior with respect to the position of holes as the pseudogap state. In the small doping limit a clear difference between the degree of convergence of the iterative self-consistent solution is associated to an even or odd number of electrons. It suggests that the Kramers degeneration in combination with the spin-spatial entangled nature of the hole states, leads to a new kind of pair interaction between two holes. The binding energy value is estimated as a function of the screening.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.