Paper detail

pSPICE: Partial Match Shedding for Complex Event Processing

Complex event processing (CEP) systems continuously process input event streams to detect patterns. Over time, the input event rate might fluctuate and overshoot the system's capabilities. One way to reduce the overload on the system is to use load shedding. In this paper, we propose a load shedding strategy for CEP systems which drops a portion of the CEP operator's internal state (a.k.a. partial matches) to maintain a given latency bound. The crucial question here is how many and which partial matches to drop so that a given latency bound is maintained while minimizing the degradation in the quality of results. In the stream processing domain, different load shedding strategies have been proposed that mainly depend on the importance of individual tuples. However, as CEP systems perform pattern detection, the importance of events is also influenced by other events in the stream. Our load shedding strategy uses Markov chain and Markov reward process to predict the utility/importance of partial matches to determine the ones to be dropped. In addition, we represent the utility in a way that minimizes the overhead of load shedding. Furthermore, we provide algorithms to decide when to start dropping partial matches and how many partial matches to drop. By extensively evaluating our approach on three real-world datasets and several representative queries, we show that the adverse impact of our load shedding strategy on the quality of results is considerably less than the impact of state-of-the-art load shedding strategies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.