Source author record

Albert Flaig

Albert Flaig appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

pSPICE: Partial Match Shedding for Complex Event Processing

Complex event processing (CEP) systems continuously process input event streams to detect patterns. Over time, the input event rate might fluctuate and overshoot the system's capabilities. One way to reduce the overload on the system is to use load shedding. In this paper, we propose a load shedding strategy for CEP systems which drops a portion of the CEP operator's internal state (a.k.a. partial matches) to maintain a given latency bound. The crucial question here is how many and which partial matches to drop so that a given latency bound is maintained while minimizing the degradation in the quality of results. In the stream processing domain, different load shedding strategies have been proposed that mainly depend on the importance of individual tuples. However, as CEP systems perform pattern detection, the importance of events is also influenced by other events in the stream. Our load shedding strategy uses Markov chain and Markov reward process to predict the utility/importance of partial matches to determine the ones to be dropped. In addition, we represent the utility in a way that minimizes the overhead of load shedding. Furthermore, we provide algorithms to decide when to start dropping partial matches and how many partial matches to drop. By extensively evaluating our approach on three real-world datasets and several representative queries, we show that the adverse impact of our load shedding strategy on the quality of results is considerably less than the impact of state-of-the-art load shedding strategies.