Paper detail

Pseudo-rotations vs. Rotations

Continuing the study of Hamiltonian pseudo-rotations of projective spaces, we focus on the conjecture that the fixed-point data set (the actions and the linearized flows at one-periodic orbits) of a pseudo-rotation exactly matches that data for a suitable unique true rotation even though the two maps can have very different dynamics. We prove this conjecture in several instances, e.g., for strongly non-degenerate pseudo-rotations of ${{\mathbb C}{\mathbb P}}^2$ with some notable exceptions, which we call ghost pseudo-rotations. The existence of ghost pseudo-rotations is a completely open question. The conjecture is closely related to the properties of the action and index spectra of pseudo-rotations, and ghost pseudo-rotations, if they exist, satisfy all known restrictions on the fixed-point data for pseudo-rotations but these data are distinctly different from the data for any rotation. The main new ingredient of the proofs is purely combinatorial and of independent interest. This is the index divisibility theorem connecting the divisibility properties of the Conley--Zehnder index sequence for the iterates of a map with the properties of its spectrum.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.