Paper detail

Provable Security of Networks

We propose a definition of {\it security} and a definition of {\it robustness} of networks against the cascading failure models of deliberate attacks and random errors respectively, and investigate the principles of the security and robustness of networks. We propose a {\it security model} such that networks constructed by the model are provably secure against any attacks of small sizes under the cascading failure models, and simultaneously follow a power law, and have the small world property with a navigating algorithm of time complex $O(\log n)$. It is shown that for any network $G$ constructed from the security model, $G$ satisfies some remarkable topological properties, including: (i) the {\it small community phenomenon}, that is, $G$ is rich in communities of the form $X$ of size poly logarithmic in $\log n$ with conductance bounded by $O(\frac{1}{|X|^β})$ for some constant $β$, (ii) small diameter property, with diameter $O(\log n)$ allowing a navigation by a $O(\log n)$ time algorithm to find a path for arbitrarily given two nodes, and (iii) power law distribution, and satisfies some probabilistic and combinatorial principles, including the {\it degree priority theorem}, and {\it infection-inclusion theorem}. By using these principles, we show that a network $G$ constructed from the security model is secure for any attacks of small scales under both the uniform threshold and random threshold cascading failure models. Our security theorems show that networks constructed from the security model are provably secure against any attacks of small sizes, for which natural selections of {\it homophyly, randomness} and {\it preferential attachment} are the underlying mechanisms.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.