Paper detail

Problem-Complexity Adaptive Model Selection for Stochastic Linear Bandits

We consider the problem of model selection for two popular stochastic linear bandit settings, and propose algorithms that adapts to the unknown problem complexity. In the first setting, we consider the $K$ armed mixture bandits, where the mean reward of arm $i \in [K]$, is $μ_i+ \langle α_{i,t},θ^* \rangle $, with $α_{i,t} \in \mathbb{R}^d$ being the known context vector and $μ_i \in [-1,1]$ and $θ^*$ are unknown parameters. We define $\|θ^*\|$ as the problem complexity and consider a sequence of nested hypothesis classes, each positing a different upper bound on $\|θ^*\|$. Exploiting this, we propose Adaptive Linear Bandit (ALB), a novel phase based algorithm that adapts to the true problem complexity, $\|θ^*\|$. We show that ALB achieves regret scaling of $O(\|θ^*\|\sqrt{T})$, where $\|θ^*\|$ is apriori unknown. As a corollary, when $θ^*=0$, ALB recovers the minimax regret for the simple bandit algorithm without such knowledge of $θ^*$. ALB is the first algorithm that uses parameter norm as model section criteria for linear bandits. Prior state of art algorithms \cite{osom} achieve a regret of $O(L\sqrt{T})$, where $L$ is the upper bound on $\|θ^*\|$, fed as an input to the problem. In the second setting, we consider the standard linear bandit problem (with possibly an infinite number of arms) where the sparsity of $θ^*$, denoted by $d^* \leq d$, is unknown to the algorithm. Defining $d^*$ as the problem complexity, we show that ALB achieves $O(d^*\sqrt{T})$ regret, matching that of an oracle who knew the true sparsity level. This methodology is then extended to the case of finitely many arms and similar results are proven. This is the first algorithm that achieves such model selection guarantees. We further verify our results via synthetic and real-data experiments.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.