Paper detail

Probing individual topological tunnelling events of a quantum field via their macroscopic consequences

Phase slips are topological fluctuation events that carry the superconducting order-parameter field between distinct current carrying states. Owing to these phase slips low-dimensional superconductors acquire electrical resistance. In quasi-one-dimensional nanowires it is well known that at higher temperatures phase slips occur via the process of thermal barrier-crossing by the order-parameter field. At low temperatures, the general expectation is that phase slips should proceed via quantum tunnelling events, which are known as quantum phase slips (QPS). Here we report strong evidence for individual quantum tunnelling events undergone by the superconducting order-parameter field in homogeneous nanowires.We accomplish this via measurements of the distribution of switching currents-the high-bias currents at which superconductivity gives way to resistive behaviour-whose width exhibits a rather counter-intuitive, monotonic increase with decreasing temperature. We outline a stochastic model of phase slip kinetics which relates the basic phase slip rates to switching rates. Comparison with this model indicates that the phase predominantly slips via thermal activation at high temperatures but at sufficiently low temperatures switching is caused by individual topological tunnelling events of the order-parameter field, i.e., QPS. Importantly, measurements on several wires show that quantum fluctuations tend to dominate over thermal fluctuations at larger temperatures in wires having larger critical currents. This fact provides strong supports the view that the anomalously high switching rates observed at low temperatures are indeed due to QPS, and not consequences of extraneous noise or hidden inhomogeneity of the wire.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.