Source author record

Alina Shaikhet

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
1topics
3close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Essential Constraints of Edge-Constrained Proximity Graphs

Given a plane forest F=(V,E)F = (V, E) of ∣V∣=n|V| = n points, we find the minimum set S⊆ES \subseteq E of edges such that the edge-constrained minimum spanning tree over the set VV of vertices and the set SS of constraints contains FF. We present an O(nlog⁡n)O(n \log n )-time algorithm that solves this problem. We generalize this to other proximity graphs in the constraint setting, such as the relative neighbourhood graph, Gabriel graph, ββ-skeleton and Delaunay triangulation. We present an algorithm that identifies the minimum set S⊆ES\subseteq E of edges of a given plane graph I=(V,E)I=(V,E) such that I⊆CGβ(V,S)I \subseteq CG_β(V, S) for 1≤β≤21 \leq β\leq 2, where CGβ(V,S)CG_β(V, S) is the constraint ββ-skeleton over the set VV of vertices and the set SS of constraints. The running time of our algorithm is O(n)O(n), provided that the constrained Delaunay triangulation of II is given.

preprint2016arXiv

Probing Convex Polygons with a Wedge

Minimizing the number of probes is one of the main challenges in reconstructing geometric objects with probing devices. In this paper, we investigate the problem of using an ωω-wedge probing tool to determine the exact shape and orientation of a convex polygon. An ωω-wedge consists of two rays emanating from a point called the apex of the wedge and the two rays forming an angle ωω. To probe with an ωω-wedge, we set the direction that the apex of the probe has to follow, the line L→\overrightarrow L, and the initial orientation of the two rays. A valid ωω-probe of a convex polygon OO contains OO within the ωω-wedge and its outcome consists of the coordinates of the apex, the orientation of both rays and the coordinates of the closest (to the apex) points of contact between OO and each of the rays. We present algorithms minimizing the number of probes and prove their optimality. In particular, we show how to reconstruct a convex nn-gon (with all internal angles of size larger than ωω) using 2n−22n-2 ωω-probes; if ω=π/2ω= π/2, the reconstruction uses 2n−32n-3 ωω-probes. We show that both results are optimal. Let NBN_B be the number of vertices of OO whose internal angle is at most ωω, (we show that 0≤NB≤30 \leq N_B \leq 3). We determine the shape and orientation of a general convex nn-gon with NB=1N_B=1 (respectively NB=2N_B=2, NB=3N_B=3) using 2n−12n-1 (respectively 2n+32n+3, 2n+52n+5) ωω-probes. We prove optimality for the first case. Assuming the algorithm knows the value of NBN_B in advance, the reconstruction of OO with NB=2N_B=2 or NB=3N_B=3 can be achieved with 2n+22n+2 probes,- which is optimal.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.