Paper detail

Power Enhancement and Phase Transitions for Global Testing of the Mixed Membership Stochastic Block Model

The mixed-membership stochastic block model (MMSBM) is a common model for social networks. Given an $n$-node symmetric network generated from a $K$-community MMSBM, we would like to test $K=1$ versus $K>1$. We first study the degree-based $χ^2$ test and the orthodox Signed Quadrilateral (oSQ) test. These two statistics estimate an order-2 polynomial and an order-4 polynomial of a "signal" matrix, respectively. We derive the asymptotic null distribution and power for both tests. However, for each test, there exists a parameter regime where its power is unsatisfactory. It motivates us to propose a power enhancement (PE) test to combine the strengths of both tests. We show that the PE test has a tractable null distribution and improves the power of both tests. To assess the optimality of PE, we consider a randomized setting, where the $n$ membership vectors are independently drawn from a distribution on the standard simplex. We show that the success of global testing is governed by a quantity $β_n(K,P,h)$, which depends on the community structure matrix $P$ and the mean vector $h$ of memberships. For each given $(K, P, h)$, a test is called $\textit{ optimal}$ if it distinguishes two hypotheses when $β_n(K, P,h)\to\infty$. A test is called $\textit{optimally adaptive}$ if it is optimal for all $(K, P, h)$. We show that the PE test is optimally adaptive, while many existing tests are only optimal for some particular $(K, P, h)$, hence, not optimally adaptive.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.