Source author record

Louis Cammarata

Louis Cammarata appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Power Enhancement and Phase Transitions for Global Testing of the Mixed Membership Stochastic Block Model

The mixed-membership stochastic block model (MMSBM) is a common model for social networks. Given an $n$-node symmetric network generated from a $K$-community MMSBM, we would like to test $K=1$ versus $K>1$. We first study the degree-based $χ^2$ test and the orthodox Signed Quadrilateral (oSQ) test. These two statistics estimate an order-2 polynomial and an order-4 polynomial of a "signal" matrix, respectively. We derive the asymptotic null distribution and power for both tests. However, for each test, there exists a parameter regime where its power is unsatisfactory. It motivates us to propose a power enhancement (PE) test to combine the strengths of both tests. We show that the PE test has a tractable null distribution and improves the power of both tests. To assess the optimality of PE, we consider a randomized setting, where the $n$ membership vectors are independently drawn from a distribution on the standard simplex. We show that the success of global testing is governed by a quantity $β_n(K,P,h)$, which depends on the community structure matrix $P$ and the mean vector $h$ of memberships. For each given $(K, P, h)$, a test is called $\textit{ optimal}$ if it distinguishes two hypotheses when $β_n(K, P,h)\to\infty$. A test is called $\textit{optimally adaptive}$ if it is optimal for all $(K, P, h)$. We show that the PE test is optimally adaptive, while many existing tests are only optimal for some particular $(K, P, h)$, hence, not optimally adaptive.