Paper detail

Positive definite $*$-spherical functions, property (T), and $C^*$-completions of Gelfand pairs

The study of existence of a universal $C^*$-completion of the $^*$-algebra canonically associated to a Hecke pair was initiated by Hall, who proved that the Hecke algebra associated to $(\operatorname{SL}_2(\Qp), \operatorname{SL}_2(\Zp))$ does not admit a universal $C^*$-completion. Kaliszewski, Landstad and Quigg studied the problem by placing it in the framework of Fell-Rieffel equivalence, and highlighted the role of other $C^*$-completions. In the case of the pair $(\operatorname{SL}_n(\Qp), \operatorname{SL}_n(\Zp))$ for $n\geq 3$ we show, invoking property (T) of $\operatorname{SL}_n(\Qp)$, that the $C^*$-completion of the $L^1$-Banach algebra and the corner of $C^*(\operatorname{SL}_n(\Qp))$ determined by the subgroup are distinct. In fact, we prove a more general result valid for a simple algebraic group of rank at least $2$ over a $\mathfrak{p}$-adic field with a good choice of a maximal compact open subgroup.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.