Paper detail

Polished diamond x-ray lenses

We present high quality bi-concave 2D focusing diamond x-ray lenses of apex-radius $R=100~μ$m produced via laser-ablation and improved via a mechanical polishing process. Both for polished and unpolished individual lenses and for stacks of 10 lenses, we show the remaining figure errors determined using x-ray speckle tracking and compare these results to those of commercial $R=50~μ$m beryllium lenses that have similar focusing strength and physical aperture. For two stacks of 10 diamond lenses (polished and unpolished) and a stack of 11 beryllium lenses, we present measured 2D beam profiles out of focus and wire scans to obtain the beam size in the focal plane. These results are complemented with small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements of a polished and an unpolished diamond lens. Again, we compare this to the SAXS of a beryllium lens. The polished x-ray lenses show similar figure errors to commercially available Be lenses. While the beam size in the focal plane is comparable with that of the Be lenses, the SAXS signal of the polished diamond lenses is considerably lower.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.