Paper detail

Plurality Consensus in the Gossip Model

We study Plurality Consensus in the Gossip Model over a network of $n$ anonymous agents. Each agent supports an initial opinion or color. We assume that at the onset, the number of agents supporting the plurality color exceeds that of the agents supporting any other color by a sufficiently-large bias. The goal is to provide a protocol that, with high probability, brings the system into the configuration in which all agents support the (initial) plurality color. We consider the Undecided-State Dynamics, a well-known protocol which uses just one more state (the undecided one) than those necessary to store colors. We show that the speed of convergence of this protocol depends on the initial color configuration as a whole, not just on the gap between the plurality and the second largest color community. This dependence is best captured by a novel notion we introduce, namely, the monochromatic distance ${md}(\bar{\mathbf{c}})$ which measures the distance of the initial color configuration $\bar{ \mathbf {c}}$ from the closest monochromatic one. In the complete graph, we prove that, for a wide range of the input parameters, this dynamics converges within $O({md}(\bar {\mathbf {c}}) \log {n})$ rounds. We prove that this upper bound is almost tight in the strong sense: Starting from any color configuration $\bar {\mathbf {c}}$, the convergence time is $Ω({md}(\bar {\mathbf {c}}))$. Finally, we adapt the Undecided-State Dynamics to obtain a fast, random walk-based protocol for plurality consensus on regular expanders. This protocol converges in $O({md}(\bar {\mathbf {c}}) \mathrm{polylog}(n))$ rounds using only $\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ local memory. A key-ingredient to achieve the above bounds is a new analysis of the maximum node congestion that results from performing $n$ parallel random walks on regular expanders. All our bounds hold with high probability.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.