Paper detail

Planarizing Graphs and their Drawings by Vertex Splitting

The splitting number of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the minimum number of vertex splits required to turn $G$ into a planar graph, where a vertex split removes a vertex $v \in V$, introduces two new vertices $v_1, v_2$, and distributes the edges formerly incident to $v$ among its two split copies $v_1, v_2$. The splitting number problem is known to be NP-complete. In this paper we shift focus to the splitting number of graph drawings in $\mathbb R^2$, where the new vertices resulting from vertex splits can be re-embedded into the existing drawing of the remaining graph. We first provide a non-uniform fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for the splitting number problem (without drawings). Then we show the NP-completeness of the splitting number problem for graph drawings, even for its two subproblems of (1) selecting a minimum subset of vertices to split and (2) for re-embedding a minimum number of copies of a given set of vertices. For the latter problem we present an FPT algorithm parameterized by the number of vertex splits. This algorithm reduces to a bounded outerplanarity case and uses an intricate dynamic program on a sphere-cut decomposition.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.