BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Manuel Sorge

Manuel Sorge contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational ComplexityData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COComputational GeometryDigital LibrariesMachine LearningSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Exact and Approximate Algorithms for Polytree Learning

Polytrees are a subclass of Bayesian networks that seek to capture the conditional dependencies between a set of $n$ variables as a directed forest and are motivated by their more efficient inference and improved interpretability. Since the problem of learning the best polytree is NP-hard, we study which restrictions make it more tractable by considering for example in-degree bounds, properties of score functions measuring the quality of a polytree, and approximation algorithms. We devise an algorithm that finds the optimal polytree in time $O((2+ε)^n)$ for arbitrarily small $ε> 0$ and any constant in-degree bound $k$, improving over the fastest previously known algorithm of time complexity $O(3^n)$. We further give polynomial-time algorithms for finding a polytree whose score is within a factor of $k$ from the optimal one for arbitrary scores and a factor of $2$ for additive ones. Many of the results are complemented by (nearly) tight lower bounds for either the time complexity or the approximation factors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Planarizing Graphs and their Drawings by Vertex Splitting

The splitting number of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the minimum number of vertex splits required to turn $G$ into a planar graph, where a vertex split removes a vertex $v \in V$, introduces two new vertices $v_1, v_2$, and distributes the edges formerly incident to $v$ among its two split copies $v_1, v_2$. The splitting number problem is known to be NP-complete. In this paper we shift focus to the splitting number of graph drawings in $\mathbb R^2$, where the new vertices resulting from vertex splits can be re-embedded into the existing drawing of the remaining graph. We first provide a non-uniform fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for the splitting number problem (without drawings). Then we show the NP-completeness of the splitting number problem for graph drawings, even for its two subproblems of (1) selecting a minimum subset of vertices to split and (2) for re-embedding a minimum number of copies of a given set of vertices. For the latter problem we present an FPT algorithm parameterized by the number of vertex splits. This algorithm reduces to a bounded outerplanarity case and uses an intricate dynamic program on a sphere-cut decomposition.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Influence of Dimensions on the Complexity of Computing Decision Trees

A decision tree recursively splits a feature space $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ and then assigns class labels based on the resulting partition. Decision trees have been part of the basic machine-learning toolkit for decades. A large body of work treats heuristic algorithms to compute a decision tree from training data, usually aiming to minimize in particular the size of the resulting tree. In contrast, little is known about the complexity of the underlying computational problem of computing a minimum-size tree for the given training data. We study this problem with respect to the number $d$ of dimensions of the feature space. We show that it can be solved in $O(n^{2d + 1}d)$ time, but under reasonable complexity-theoretic assumptions it is not possible to achieve $f(d) \cdot n^{o(d / \log d)}$ running time, where $n$ is the number of training examples. The problem is solvable in $(dR)^{O(dR)} \cdot n^{1+o(1)}$ time, if there are exactly two classes and $R$ is an upper bound on the number of tree leaves labeled with the first~class.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The role of twins in computing planar supports of hypergraphs

A support or realization of a hypergraph $H$ is a graph $G$ on the same vertex as $H$ such that for each hyperedge of $H$ it holds that its vertices induce a connected subgraph of $G$. The NP-hard problem of finding a planar support has applications in hypergraph drawing and network design. Previous algorithms for the problem assume that twins -- pairs of vertices that are in precisely the same hyperedges -- can safely be removed from the input hypergraph. We prove that this assumption is generally wrong, yet that the number of twins necessary for a hypergraph to have a planar support only depends on its number of hyperedges. We give an explicit upper bound on the number of twins necessary for a hypergraph with $m$ hyperedges to have an $r$-outerplanar support, which depends only on $r$ and $m$. Since all additional twins can be safely removed, we obtain a linear-time algorithm for computing $r$-outerplanar supports for hypergraphs with $m$ hyperedges if $m$ and $r$ are constant; in other words, the problem is fixed-parameter linear-time solvable with respect to the parameters $m$ and $r$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient fully dynamic elimination forests with applications to detecting long paths and cycles

We present a data structure that in a dynamic graph of treedepth at most $d$, which is modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, maintains an optimum-height elimination forest. The data structure achieves worst-case update time $2^{{\cal O}(d^2)}$, which matches the best known parameter dependency in the running time of a static fpt algorithm for computing the treedepth of a graph. This improves a result of Dvořák et al. [ESA 2014], who for the same problem achieved update time $f(d)$ for some non-elementary (i.e. tower-exponential) function $f$. As a by-product, we improve known upper bounds on the sizes of minimal obstructions for having treedepth $d$ from doubly-exponential in $d$ to $d^{{\cal O}(d)}$. As applications, we design new fully dynamic parameterized data structures for detecting long paths and cycles in general graphs. More precisely, for a fixed parameter $k$ and a dynamic graph $G$, modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, our data structures maintain answers to the following queries: - Does $G$ contain a simple path on $k$ vertices? - Does $G$ contain a simple cycle on at least $k$ vertices? In the first case, the data structure achieves amortized update time $2^{{\cal O}(k^2)}$. In the second case, the amortized update time is $2^{{\cal O}(k^4)} + {\cal O}(k \log n)$. In both cases we assume access to a dictionary on the edges of $G$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

h-Index Manipulation by Undoing Merges

The h-index is an important bibliographic measure used to assess the performance of researchers. Dutiful researchers merge different versions of their articles in their Google Scholar profile even though this can decrease their h-index. In this article, we study the manipulation of the h-index by undoing such merges. In contrast to manipulation by merging articles (van Bevern et al. [Artif. Intel. 240:19-35, 2016]) such manipulation is harder to detect. We present numerous results on computational complexity (from linear-time algorithms to parameterized computational hardness results) and empirically indicate that at least small improvements of the h-index by splitting merged articles are unfortunately easily achievable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access