BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jules Wulms

Jules Wulms contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational ComplexityComputational Geometry

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Competitive Searching over Terrains

We study a variant of the searching problem where the environment consists of a known terrain and the goal is to obtain visibility of an unknown target point on the surface of the terrain. The searcher starts on the surface of the terrain and is allowed to fly above the terrain. The goal is to devise a searching strategy that minimizes the competitive ratio, that is, the worst-case ratio between the distance traveled by the searching strategy and the minimum travel distance needed to detect the target. For $1.5$D terrains we show that any searching strategy has a competitive ratio of at least $\sqrt{82}$ and we present a nearly-optimal searching strategy that achieves a competitive ratio of $3\sqrt{19/2} \approx \sqrt{82} + 0.19$. This strategy extends directly to the case where the searcher has no knowledge of the terrain beforehand. For $2.5$D terrains we show that the optimal competitive ratio depends on the maximum slope $λ$ of the terrain, and is hence unbounded in general. Specifically, we provide a lower bound on the competitive ratio of $Ω(\sqrtλ)$. Finally, we complement the lower bound with a searching strategy based on the maximum slope of the known terrain, which achieves a competitive ratio of $O(\sqrtλ)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Planarizing Graphs and their Drawings by Vertex Splitting

The splitting number of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the minimum number of vertex splits required to turn $G$ into a planar graph, where a vertex split removes a vertex $v \in V$, introduces two new vertices $v_1, v_2$, and distributes the edges formerly incident to $v$ among its two split copies $v_1, v_2$. The splitting number problem is known to be NP-complete. In this paper we shift focus to the splitting number of graph drawings in $\mathbb R^2$, where the new vertices resulting from vertex splits can be re-embedded into the existing drawing of the remaining graph. We first provide a non-uniform fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for the splitting number problem (without drawings). Then we show the NP-completeness of the splitting number problem for graph drawings, even for its two subproblems of (1) selecting a minimum subset of vertices to split and (2) for re-embedding a minimum number of copies of a given set of vertices. For the latter problem we present an FPT algorithm parameterized by the number of vertex splits. This algorithm reduces to a bounded outerplanarity case and uses an intricate dynamic program on a sphere-cut decomposition.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Influence of Dimensions on the Complexity of Computing Decision Trees

A decision tree recursively splits a feature space $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ and then assigns class labels based on the resulting partition. Decision trees have been part of the basic machine-learning toolkit for decades. A large body of work treats heuristic algorithms to compute a decision tree from training data, usually aiming to minimize in particular the size of the resulting tree. In contrast, little is known about the complexity of the underlying computational problem of computing a minimum-size tree for the given training data. We study this problem with respect to the number $d$ of dimensions of the feature space. We show that it can be solved in $O(n^{2d + 1}d)$ time, but under reasonable complexity-theoretic assumptions it is not possible to achieve $f(d) \cdot n^{o(d / \log d)}$ running time, where $n$ is the number of training examples. The problem is solvable in $(dR)^{O(dR)} \cdot n^{1+o(1)}$ time, if there are exactly two classes and $R$ is an upper bound on the number of tree leaves labeled with the first~class.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access