Paper detail

Physical properties of new MAX phase borides M2SB (M = Zr, Hf and Nb) in comparison with conventional MAX phase carbides M2SC (M = Zr, Hf and Nb): Comprehensive insights

In this article, a detailed study of the recently synthesized MAX phase borides M2SB (M = Zr, Hf and Nb) has been performed via first principles technique. Investigation of mechanical hardness, elastic anisotropy, optical properties, dynamical stability and thermal properties are considered for the first time. The estimated values of stiffness constants and elastic moduli are found in good agreement with available results. The micro and macro hardness (Hmicro and Hmacro) parameters are calculated. The Vickers hardness is also calculated using Mulliken population analysis. The electronic density of states and charge density mapping are used to explain the variation of stiffness constants, elastic moduli and hardness parameters among the studied ternary borides. The Nb2SB compound is found to show best combination of mechanical properties. Mixture of covalent and ionic bonding within these borides is explained using Mulliken population analysis. The direction dependent values of Youngs modulus, compressibility, shear modulus and Poissons ratio are visualized by 2D and 3D representations and different anisotropic factors are calculated. The important optical constants are calculated and analyzed. The metallic nature of the studied borides is confirmed from the DOS and optical properties. The reflectivity spectra reveal the potential use of Zr2SB as coating materials to diminish solar heating. The studied borides are dynamically stable as confirmed from the phonon dispersion curves. The characteristic thermodynamic properties have also been calculated and analyzed. The physical properties of corresponding 211 MAX phase carbides are also calculated for comparison with those of the titled ternary borides.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.