Paper detail

Photophysical comparison of liquid and mechanically exfoliated WS$_2$ monolayers

Semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are desired as active materials in optoelectronic devices due to their strong excitonic effects. They can be exfoliated from their parent layered materials with low-cost and for mass production via a liquid exfoliation method. However, the device application of TMDs prepared by liquid phase exfoliation is limited by their poor photoluminescence quantum efficiencies (PLQE). It is crucial to understand the reason to low PLQE for their practical device development. Here we evaluate the quality of monolayer-enriched liquid phase exfoliated (LPE) WS$_2$ dispersions by systematically investigating their optical and photophysical properties and contrasting with mechanically exfoliated (ME) WS2 monolayers. An in-depth understanding of the exciton dynamics is gained with ultrafast pump-probe measurements. We reveal that the energy transfer between monolayer and few-layers in LPE WS$_2$ dispersions is a substantial reason for their quenched PL. In addition, we show that LPE WS$_2$ is promising to build high performance optoelectronic devices with excellent optical quality.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.