Paper detail

Phenomenological Theory for Spatiotemporal Chaos in Rayleigh-Benard Convection

We present a phenomenological theory for spatiotemporal chaos (STC) in Rayleigh-Benard convection, based on the generalized Swift-Hohenberg model. We apply a random phase approximation to STC and conjecture a scaling form for the structure factor $S(k)$ with respect to the correlation length $ξ_2$. We hence obtain analytical results for the time-averaged convective current $J$ and the time-averaged vorticity current $Ω$. We also define power-law behaviors such as $J \sim ε^μ$, $Ω\sim ε^λ$ and $ξ_2 \sim ε^{-ν}$, where $ε$ is the control parameter. We find from our theory that $μ= 1$, $ν\ge 1/2$ and $λ= 2 μ+ ν$ for phase turbulence and that $μ= 1$, $ν\ge 1/2$ and $λ= 2 μ+ 2 ν$ for spiral-defect chaos. These predictions, together with the scaling conjecture for $S(k)$, are confirmed by our numerical results. Finally we suggest that Porod's law, $S(k) \sim 1/ξ_2 k^3$ for large $k$, might be valid in STC.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors6 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.