Paper detail

Phase Transitions for Detecting Latent Geometry in Random Graphs

Random graphs with latent geometric structure are popular models of social and biological networks, with applications ranging from network user profiling to circuit design. These graphs are also of purely theoretical interest within computer science, probability and statistics. A fundamental initial question regarding these models is: when are these random graphs affected by their latent geometry and when are they indistinguishable from simpler models without latent structure, such as the Erdős-Rényi graph $\mathcal{G}(n, p)$? We address this question for two of the most well-studied models of random graphs with latent geometry -- the random intersection and random geometric graph. Our results are as follows: (1) we prove that the random intersection graph converges in total variation to $\mathcal{G}(n, p)$ when $d = \tildeω(n^3)$, and does not if $d = o(n^3)$, resolving an open problem in Fill et al. (2000), Rybarczyk (2011) and Kim et al. (2018); (2) we provide conditions under which the matrix of intersection sizes of random family of sets converges in total variation to a symmetric matrix with independent Poisson entries, yielding the first total variation convergence result for $τ$-random intersection graphs to $\mathcal{G}(n, p)$; and (3) we show that the random geometric graph on $\mathbb{S}^{d - 1}$ with edge density $p$ converges in total variation to $\mathcal{G}(n, p)$ when $d = \tildeω\left(\min\{ pn^3, p^2 n^{7/2} \} \right)$, yielding the first progress towards a conjecture of Bubeck et al. (2016). The first of these three results was obtained simultaneously and independently by Bubeck, Racz and Richey.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.