Paper detail

Permutation test for the multivariate coefficient of variation in factorial designs

New inference methods for the multivariate coefficient of variation and its reciprocal, the standardized mean, are presented. While there are various testing procedures for both parameters in the univariate case, it is less known how to do inference in the multivariate setting appropriately. There are some existing procedures but they rely on restrictive assumptions on the underlying distributions. We tackle this problem by applying Wald-type statistics in the context of general, potentially heteroscedastic factorial designs. In addition to the $k$-sample case, higher-way layouts can be incorporated into this framework allowing the discussion of main and interaction effects. The resulting procedures are shown to be asymptotically valid under the null hypothesis and consistent under general alternatives. To improve the finite sample performance, we suggest permutation versions of the tests and shown that the tests' asymptotic properties can be transferred to them. An exhaustive simulation study compares the new tests, their permutation counterparts and existing methods. To further analyse the differences between the tests, we conduct two illustrative real data examples.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.