Paper detail

Percolation thresholds of two-dimensional continuum systems of rectangles [with erratum]

The present work introduces an efficient Monte Carlo algorithm for continuum percolation composed of randomly-oriented rectangles. By conducting extensive simulations, we report high precision percolation thresholds for a variety of homogeneous systems with different rectangle aspect ratios. This work verifies and extends the excluded area theory. It is confirmed that percolation thresholds are dominated by the average excluded areas for both homogeneous and heterogeneous rectangle systems (except for some special heterogeneous systems where the rectangle lengths differ too much from one another). In terms of the excluded areas, generalized formulae are proposed to effectively predict precise percolation thresholds for all these rectangle systems. This work is therefore helpful for both practical applications and theoretical studies concerning relevant systems. The Erratum addresses errors in our earlier paper "Percolation thresholds of two-dimensional continuum systems of rectangles" published in [Phys. Rev. E 88, 012101 (2013)].

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.