Paper detail

PCA-RF: An Efficient Parkinson's Disease Prediction Model based on Random Forest Classification

In this modern era of overpopulation disease prediction is a crucial step in diagnosing various diseases at an early stage. With the advancement of various machine learning algorithms, the prediction has become quite easy. However, the complex and the selection of an optimal machine learning technique for the given dataset greatly affects the accuracy of the model. A large amount of datasets exists globally but there is no effective use of it due to its unstructured format. Hence, a lot of different techniques are available to extract something useful for the real world to implement. Therefore, accuracy becomes a major metric in evaluating the model. In this paper, a disease prediction approach is proposed that implements a random forest classifier on Parkinson's disease. We compared the accuracy of this model with the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) applied Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model and captured a visible difference. The model secured a significant accuracy of up to 90%.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.