Paper detail

Partial Correlation Screening for Estimating Large Precision Matrices, with Applications to Classification

We propose Partial Correlation Screening (PCS) as a new row-by-row approach to estimating a large precision matrix $Ω$. To estimate the $i$-th row of $Ω$, $1 \leq i \leq p$, PCS uses a Screen step and a Clean step. In the Screen step, PCS recruits a (small) subset of indices using a stage-wise algorithm, where in each stage, the algorithm updates the set of recruited indices by adding the index $j$ that has the largest (in magnitude) empirical partial correlation with $i$. In the Clean step, PCS re-investigates all recruited indices and use them to reconstruct the $i$-th row of $Ω$. PCS is computationally efficient and modest in memory use: to estimate a row of $Ω$, it only needs a few rows (determined sequentially) of the empirical covariance matrix. This enables PCS to execute the estimation of a large precision matrix (e.g., $p=10K$) in a few minutes, and open doors to estimating much larger precision matrices. We use PCS for classification. Higher Criticism Thresholding (HCT) is a recent classifier that enjoys optimality, but to exploit its full potential in practice, one needs a good estimate of the precision matrix $Ω$. Combining HCT with any approach to estimating $Ω$ gives a new classifier: examples include HCT-PCS and HCT-glasso. We have applied HCT-PCS to two large microarray data sets ($p = 8K$ and $10K$) for classification, where it not only significantly outperforms HCT-glasso, but also is competitive to the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF). The results suggest that PCS gives more useful estimates of $Ω$ than the glasso. We set up a general theoretical framework and show that in a broad context, PCS fully recovers the support of $Ω$ and HCT-PCS yields optimal classification behavior. Our proofs shed interesting light on the behavior of stage-wise procedures.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.