Paper detail

Parsimonious and powerful composite likelihood testing for group difference and genotype-phenotype association

Testing the association between a phenotype and many genetic variants from case-control data is essential in genome-wide association study (GWAS). This is a challenging task as many such variants are correlated or non-informative. Similarities exist in testing the population difference between two groups of high dimensional data with intractable full likelihood function. Testing may be tackled by a maximum composite likelihood (MCL) not entailing the full likelihood, but current MCL tests are subject to power loss for involving non-informative or redundant sub-likelihoods. In this paper, we develop a forward search and test method for simultaneous powerful group difference testing and informative sub-likelihoods composition. Our method constructs a sequence of Wald-type test statistics by including only informative sub-likelihoods progressively so as to improve the test power under local sparsity alternatives. Numerical studies show that it achieves considerable improvement over the available tests as the modeling complexity grows. Our method is further validated by testing the motivating GWAS data on breast cancer with interesting results obtained.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.