Paper detail

Parametric inference for proportional (reverse) hazard rate models with nomination sampling

\noindent Randomized nomination sampling (RNS) is a rank-based sampling technique which has been shown to be effective in several nonparametric studies involving environmental and ecological applications. In this paper, we investigate parametric inference using RNS design for estimating the unknown vector of parameters $\boldsymbolθ$ in the proportional hazard rate and proportional reverse hazard rate models. We examine both maximum likelihood (ML) and method of moments (MM) methods and investigate the relative precision of our proposed RNS-based estimators compared with those based on simple random sampling (SRS). We introduce four types of RNS-based data as well as necessary EM algorithms for the ML estimation, and evaluate the performance of corresponding estimators in estimating $\boldsymbolθ$. We show that there are always values of the design parameters on which RNS-based estimators are more efficient than those based on SRS. Inference based on imperfect ranking is also explored and it is shown that the improvement holds even when the ranking is imperfect. Theoretical results are augmented with numerical evaluations and a case study.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.