Paper detail

$P$-wave contributions to $B_{(s)}\toψKπ$ decays in perturbative QCD approach

In this work, we studied the quasi-two-body decays $B_{(s)} \to ψ[K^*(892), K^*(1410),$ $K^*(1680)] \to ψKπ$ by employing the perturbative QCD (PQCD) factorization approach, where the charmonia $ψ$ represents $J/ψ$ and $ψ(2S)$. The corresponding decay channels are studied by constructing the kaon-pion distribution amplitude (DA) $Φ_{K π}^{\rm P}$, which contained the important final state interactions between the kaon and pion in the resonant region. The relativistic Breit-Wigner formulas are adopted to parameterize the time-like form factor $F_{Kπ}$ appeared in the kaon-pion DAs. The SU(3) flavor symmetry breaking effect resulting from the mass difference between kaon and pion is taken into account, which makes significant contributions to the longitudinal polarizations. We accommodate well the observed branching ratios and the polarization fractions of the $B_{(s)} \to ψK^*(892) \to ψKπ$ by tuning the hadronic parameters for the kaon-pion DAs. The PQCD predictions for the $B_{(s)} \to ψ[K^*(1410), K^*(1680)] \to ψKπ$ modes from the same set of parameters can be tested by the future precise data from the LHCb and the Belle II experiments.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.