Paper detail

p-i-n Tunnel FETs vs. n-i-n MOSFETs: Performance Comparison from Devices to Circuits

The band-to-band tunneling transistors have some performance advantages over the conventional MOSFETs due to the <60mV/dec sub-threshold slope. In this paper, carbon nanotubes are used as a model channel material to address issues that we believe will apply to BTBT FETs vs. MOSFETs more generally. We use pz-orbital tight-binding Hamiltonian and the non-equilibrium Green function (NEGF) formalism for rigorous treatment of dissipative quantum transport. A device level comparison of p-i-n TFETs and n-i-n MOSFETs in both ballistic and dissipative cases has been performed previously. In this paper, the possibility of using p-i-n TFETs in ultra-low power sub-threshold logic circuits is investigated using a rigorous numerical simulator. The results show that, in sub-threshold circuit operation, the p-i-n TFETs have better DC characteristics, and can deliver ~15x higher performance at the iso-P_LEAKAGE, iso-VDD conditions. Because p-i-n TFETs can operate at lower VDD than n-i-n MOSFETs, they can deliver ~3x higher performance at the same power (P_OPERATION). This results in ~3x energy reduction under iso-delay conditions. Therefore the p-i-n TFETs are more suitable for sub-threshold logic operation.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.