Paper detail

Optimizing achromaticity in metalenses, and development of a layered thin-film metalens

Metalenses are ultrathin optical devices designed to replicate behavior of conventional refractive lenses, or lens arrays, utilizing nanoscale resonant structures to redirect incident light. These are often comprised of discrete meta-atoms such as nanoscale dielectric pillars. Achromatic focusing - associated with traditional multi-element refractive counterparts - is frequently attempted with single-layer metalens designs, which has proven difficult to achieve with bounded refractive indices and total lens thickness. A recent study (F.Presutti and F.Monticone, 2020) formalized this, applying optical delay-line limitations to metalenses, resulting in a generalized trade-off in achromaticity for focusing systems. In this work, we (1) theoretically explore achromaticity in metalens design, and (2) propose a thin-film multilayer design as an alternative to the discrete meta-atom approach for large numerical aperture (NA) achromatic metalenses. It is shown that wavefront modulation can also be achieved with spectrally-varying transmission magnitudes, rather than purely matching a phase profile. In fact, even with a bounded refractive index, perfect achromatic operation over a given spectral range can be offset by imperfect operation elsewhere, resulting in a NA limited by the smallest general spectral feature controlled. These considerations lead to a generalized phase-matching optimization routine, and a thin-film metalens is simulated, utilizing layered TiO2/MgF2 with total thicknesses under 1 μm (20 layers), focusing across 6 simultaneous wavelengths (350-740 nm, Δλ~65 nm). A significant proportion (>40% spectral average) of the reflected light is focused for moderate NA (~0.35). With the maturity of the optical coating industry, the conformal thin-film approach reduces manufacturing complexity from its discrete nanoscale meta-atom equivalents.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.