Paper detail

Optimization of the storage database for the Monitoring system of the CTA

We present preliminary test results for the correct sizing of the bare metal hardware that will host the database of the Monitoring system (MON) for the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). The MON is the subsystem of the Array Control and Data Acquisition System (ACADA) that is responsible for monitoring and logging the overall CTA array. It acquires and stores monitoring points and logging information from the array elements, at each of the CTA sites. MON is designed and built in order to deal with big data time series, and exploits some of the currently most advanced technologies in the fields of databases and Internet of Things (IoT). To dimension the bare metal hardware required by the monitoring system (excluding the logging), we performed the test campaign that is discussed in this paper. We discuss here the best set of parameters and the optimized configuration to maximize the database data writing in terms of the number of updated rows per second. We also demonstrate the feasibility of our approach in the frame of the CTA requirements.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.