Paper detail

Optimality of Maximum Likelihood for Log-Concave Density Estimation and Bounded Convex Regression

In this paper, we study two problems: (1) estimation of a $d$-dimensional log-concave distribution and (2) bounded multivariate convex regression with random design with an underlying log-concave density or a compactly supported distribution with a continuous density. First, we show that for all $d \ge 4$ the maximum likelihood estimators of both problems achieve an optimal risk of $Θ_d(n^{-2/(d+1)})$ (up to a logarithmic factor) in terms of squared Hellinger distance and $L_2$ squared distance, respectively. Previously, the optimality of both these estimators was known only for $d\le 3$. We also prove that the $ε$-entropy numbers of the two aforementioned families are equal up to logarithmic factors. We complement these results by proving a sharp bound $Θ_d(n^{-2/(d+4)})$ on the minimax rate (up to logarithmic factors) with respect to the total variation distance. Finally, we prove that estimating a log-concave density - even a uniform distribution on a convex set - up to a fixed accuracy requires the number of samples \emph{at least} exponential in the dimension. We do that by improving the dimensional constant in the best known lower bound for the minimax rate from $2^{-d}\cdot n^{-2/(d+1)}$ to $c\cdot n^{-2/(d+1)}$ (when $d\geq 2$).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.