Paper detail

Optimal Linear Discriminators For The Discrete Choice Model In Growing Dimensions

Manski's celebrated maximum score estimator for the discrete choice model, which is an optimal linear discriminator, has been the focus of much investigation in both the econometrics and statistics literatures, but its behavior under growing dimension scenarios largely remains unknown. This paper addresses that gap. Two different cases are considered: $p$ grows with $n$ but at a slow rate, i.e. $p/n \rightarrow 0$; and $p \gg n$ (fast growth). In the binary response model, we recast Manski's score estimation as empirical risk minimization for a classification problem, and derive the $\ell_2$ rate of convergence of the score estimator under a \emph{transition condition} in terms of our margin parameter that calibrates the level of difficulty of the estimation problem. We also establish upper and lower bounds for the minimax $\ell_2$ error in the binary choice model that differ by a logarithmic factor, and construct a minimax-optimal estimator in the slow growth regime. Some extensions to the general case -- the multinomial response model -- are also considered. Last but not least, we use a variety of learning algorithms to compute the maximum score estimator in growing dimensions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.