Paper detail

Optimal Estimation of the Number of Communities

In network analysis, how to estimate the number of communities $K$ is a fundamental problem. We consider a broad setting where we allow severe degree heterogeneity and a wide range of sparsity levels, and propose Stepwise Goodness-of-Fit (StGoF) as a new approach. This is a stepwise algorithm, where for $m = 1, 2, \ldots$, we alternately use a community detection step and a goodness-of-fit (GoF) step. We adapt SCORE \cite{SCORE} for community detection, and propose a new GoF metric. We show that at step $m$, the GoF metric diverges to $\infty$ in probability for all $m < K$ and converges to $N(0,1)$ if $m = K$. This gives rise to a consistent estimate for $K$. Also, we discover the right way to define the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for our problem and show that consistent estimates for $K$ do not exist if $\mathrm{SNR} \goto 0$, and StGoF is uniformly consistent for $K$ if $\mathrm{SNR} \goto \infty$. Therefore, StGoF achieves the optimal phase transition. Similar stepwise methods (e.g., \cite{wang2017likelihood, ma2018determining}) are known to face analytical challenges. We overcome the challenges by using a different stepwise scheme in StGoF and by deriving sharp results that are not available before. The key to our analysis is to show that SCORE has the {\it Non-Splitting Property (NSP)}. Primarily due to a non-tractable rotation of eigenvectors dictated by the Davis-Kahan $\sin(θ)$ theorem, the NSP is non-trivial to prove and requires new techniques we develop.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.