Abstract

Suppose we have many copies of an unknown nn-qubit state ρρ. We measure some copies of ρρ using a known two-outcome measurement E1E_{1}, then other copies using a measurement E2E_{2}, and so on. At each stage tt, we generate a current hypothesis σtσ_{t} about the state ρρ, using the outcomes of the previous measurements. We show that it is possible to do this in a way that guarantees that ∣Tr⁡(Eiσt)−Tr⁡(Eiρ)∣|\operatorname{Tr}(E_{i} σ_{t}) - \operatorname{Tr}(E_{i}ρ) |, the error in our prediction for the next measurement, is at least ε\varepsilon at most O⁡ ⁣(n/ε2)\operatorname{O}\!\left(n / \varepsilon^2 \right) times. Even in the "non-realizable" setting---where there could be arbitrary noise in the measurement outcomes---we show how to output hypothesis states that do significantly worse than the best possible states at most O⁡ ⁣(Tn)\operatorname{O}\!\left(\sqrt {Tn}\right) times on the first TT measurements. These results generalize a 2007 theorem by Aaronson on the PAC-learnability of quantum states, to the online and regret-minimization settings. We give three different ways to prove our results---using convex optimization, quantum postselection, and sequential fat-shattering dimension---which have different advantages in terms of parameters and portability.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.