Paper detail

On uncertainty and information properties of ranked set samples

Ranked set sampling is a sampling design which has a wide range of applications in industrial statistics, and environmental and ecological studies, etc.. It is well known that ranked set samples provide more Fisher information than simple random samples of the same size about the unknown parameters of the underlying distribution in parametric inferences. In this paper, we consider the uncertainty and information content of ranked set samples in both perfect and imperfect ranking scenarios in terms of Shannon entropy, Rényi and Kullback-Leibler (KL) information measures. It is proved that under these information measures, ranked set sampling design performs better than its simple random sampling counterpart of the same size. The information content is also a monotone function of the set size in ranked set sampling. Moreover, the effect of ranking error on the information content of the data is investigated.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.